Strategy Reporting Is Shifting from Progress to “Execution Health”
- Max Bowen
- Dec 15, 2025
- 1 min read
What’s happening
Strategy leaders are quietly moving away from milestone and RAG based reporting toward execution health indicators, metrics that surface friction before delivery slips.
Instead of asking, “Is this initiative on track?” they’re asking, “Is this initiative still executable?”
This shift is showing up across strategy platforms, PMOs, and transformation offices as leaders track things like decision latency, ownership activity, resource lock-in, and adoption, not just progress against plan.
Why it matters
Traditional progress reporting is a lagging indicator.
By the time milestones go red:
decisions have already stalled
resources are already misallocated
owners have already disengaged
momentum is already lost
Execution health metrics surface risk weeks or months earlier, when leaders can still intervene cheaply. In volatile environments, that early signal is becoming more valuable than perfect plans.
What to do next week
Add one leading indicator to your top 3 initiatives Examples:
- time since last decision
- days without owner update
- % of capacity actually allocated
- adoption vs. plan
Replace one status update with a health check In your next exec review, drop the RAG status and ask:“What would prevent this from delivering in the next 30 days?”
Flag silence as a risk Set a simple rule: if an initiative has no owner activity or decision movement for 30 days, it automatically escalates, regardless of reported status.




Comments