top of page

Dynamic Resource Allocation

  • Writer: Max Bowen
    Max Bowen
  • Nov 7
  • 2 min read

Move talent and budget monthly instead of locking it in annually.


Why this matters


AI, competitors, and market shifts now create opportunity windows inside weeks, not years.

Static annual budgets = static companies.Dynamic allocation = adaptive companies.


How the model works


1) Review top initiatives monthly


Ask:

  • Where is value showing up right now?

  • What’s stalled?

  • What changed externally?

  • Is this still worth doing?


2) Put every initiative into one of four buckets


  • Explore — early idea, low cost, quick signal

  • Pilot — proving value with real users

  • Scale — repeatable results, meeting performance targets

  • Sustain — stable business-as-usual


This creates visibility.


3) Move 2–5% of resources every month


Small reallocation beats big annual swings.


Examples:

  • Add capacity to a pilot showing fast adoption

  • Reduce funding to a transformation showing weak traction

  • Move budget from “innovation” into workflow redesign with proven ROI

  • Reassign talent from stalled work into priority teams


4) Kill or pivot weak bets


If there’s no traction after 60–90 days → retire or redesign it.

This is what most transformations fail to do.


Real example (anonymised)


A telco used this process during an AI-driven operations redesign.

In 3 months:


  • Reallocated 4% of strategy + analytics headcount

  • Shut down 3 low-value streams

  • Shifted funding into forecasting automation

  • Delivered measurable cycle-time improvement


Outcome:Better ROI + clearer focus + higher organisational energy.


What “good” looks like


  • Every initiative has a clear stage and owner

  • 2–5% monthly reallocation is normal, not dramatic

  • Low-value work is closed publicly (builds credibility)

  • Finance becomes a partner, not a gatekeeper

  • Strategy leads the rhythm, not just observes it


Common failure modes


  • Leaders treat stages as “labels,” not decision points

  • Teams resist closing weak bets

  • No clear metrics for traction

  • Reallocation becomes political instead of data-driven

  • Finance and strategy operate separately


Metrics that matter


  • Reallocation rate (%)

  • Adoption or performance lift in scaled initiatives


Organisations that reallocate >5% annually outperform peers — McKinsey, Bain, and BCG all show this.

Comments


bottom of page